FLAME/SMOKE
TESTS & LEAD CONTENT
RELATIVE
TOXICITY TABLES
FLAME/SMOKE
TESTS & LEAD CONTENT
*VERTICAL
BURNING TEST (U.L. 94)
Polywood® has a rating of V-0. V-0 is the least flammable
rating that any product can achieve. A rating of V-0 means the part
will self-extinguish when flame source is removed.
For Underwriters Laboratories Inc. Test UL 94 Vertical Burning test.
This test determines the upward burning characteristics of a solid of
a given thickness.
**SURFACE
BURNING CHARACTERISTICS (E-84 TUNNEL TEST)
Polywood has a flame spread rating of 14.3. This qualifies as Class
A, the best possible qualification for a product tested in the internationally
recognized UL E-84 Tunnel Test. The benchmark for comparative purposes
is Red Oak which is rated at 100.
| |
Flame
Spread |
Smoke |
| Styrene |
171.1 |
820.5 |
| Polywood® |
14.3 |
180.08 |
**For Underwriters Laboratories Inc. test UL 723 (E-84 Tunnel Test)
Standard Test Method for Surface Burning Characteristics of Building
Materials. This test determines the comparative burning characteristics
of a material by evaluating the spread of flame over its surface and
the density of smoke developed when exposed to a test fire.
POLYWOOD® CONTAINS NO LEAD
This information has been gathered from various independent sources
RELATIVE TOXICITY TABLES
SCREENING
MATERIALS FOR RELATIVE TOXICITY IN FIRE SITUATIONS
Results of screening tests of materials for relative toxicity under
specific sets of conditions are presented. Variations in the material,
in lab animals, and in the test presently permit identification of major
rather than minor differences among materials. Correlation with relative
performance in real fire situations is based on a limited number of
comparisons.
Studies of fire victims in New York City and in Maryland showed that
carbon-monoxide poisoning was a major factor in fire deaths and in failures
to escape from fires. The extent to which gases other than carbon monoxide
increase the toxic threat in fires depends on the chemical composition
of the material and on the many variables in an actual fire. No two
fires are exactly alike, and the "typical" or "real"
fire may never be defined to the satisfaction of a majority of those
concerned. In the meantime there is a continuing need for apparatus
and procedures to provide measures of the relative toxicity of all products.
The following list has been condensed to materials more commonly used
in the commercial building industry.
In reviewing these numbers, the higher the value
the better the product.
TABLE
1: Relative Toxicity of Materials
| |
Value |
|
|
Value |
| Material |
@
Td2 |
|
Material |
@
Td2 |
| |
|
|
|
|
| Wool/Spandex
99/1 fabric |
5.80 |
|
Polyester
foam |
13.66 |
| Nylon/PUR
foam/acrylic fabric |
6.72 |
|
Beech |
13.82 |
| Cotton
batting, 2 |
9.66 |
|
Aspen
poplar |
14.06 |
| Polyester
batting, 13.3% acrylic resin |
10.15 |
|
Acetate/rayon/cotton
20/30/50 fabric |
14.22 |
| Leather |
10.22 |
|
Cotton
100% fabric |
14.22 |
| Hemlock,
untreated |
10.80 |
|
Western
hemlock |
14.37 |
| Hardboard,
unfinished |
10.86 |
|
Red
oak, 1 |
14.50 |
| Red
oak, 2 |
11.50 |
|
Douglas
fir, 1 |
14.76 |
| Particleboard,
untreated |
11.82 |
|
Western
red cedar |
14.91 |
| Aromatic
polyamide fabric, 1 |
13.50 |
|
Yellow
birch |
15.09 |
| PUR
flexible foam, FR, 2.60 pct. H5 |
13.51 |
|
Eastern
white pine |
15.42 |
| Douglas
fir, 2 |
13.62 |
|
Southern
yellow pine |
15.56
|
| |
|
|
Polywood® |
16.37 |
| |
|
|
Glass
fiber/nylon fabric |
24.60 |
|